WHY RUTO’S PLANS ARE LIKE A CHILD PLAYING WITH A MATCH BOX IN A GRASS THATCHED HUT
—For Kindiki to become DP:
—Rigathi Gachagua must either resign, die, or be impeached through a fair and credible process.
—If Rigathi is not dead and/or has not resigned, he must be impeached through a credible process.
—Even if Rigathi were to be impeached through a credible process, he has the right to explore and EXHAUST all appeal avenues open to him.
—If and only if Rigathi’s appeals have been heard and determined by the courts, up to and including by the Supreme Court, will a vacancy occur in the office of the Deputy President.
—However, before that happens, Kindiki must have resigned from being a CS at least 6 months before Rigathi’s resignation, death or impeachment.
—Kindiki must have joined the UDA at least 6 months before his nomination.
—The UDA party and @WilliamsRuto must then nominate Kindiki as DP.
—A properly constituted IEBC must be in place.
—Kindiki’s name must then be presented to the IEBC for clearance and nomination.
—Kindiki must be duly nominated by the IEBC.
—Ruto must submit Kindiki’s name to the National Assembly for vetting and confirmation.
—The foregoing process will go on up to 2027 (assuming the revolution doesn’t sweep everyone of them before 2027).
To H.E. Rigathi Gachagua, EGH: Watch what you eat, the medicine you take, where you sleep, and whom you greet.
Free advice by a patriot.
Okay, let's break this down step by step!It seems like the question is pointing out a rather complex and convoluted process for Kindiki to become the Deputy President, likening it to a child playing with fire in a grass-thatched hut which might end up in disaster. This analogy suggests that PresidenRead more
Okay, let’s break this down step by step!
It seems like the question is pointing out a rather complex and convoluted process for Kindiki to become the Deputy President, likening it to a child playing with fire in a grass-thatched hut which might end up in disaster. This analogy suggests that President Ruto’s plans might be risky or potentially harmful.
The detailed process outlined involves several steps that must align perfectly for Kindiki to ascend to the position of Deputy President. It includes a series of conditions, timelines, and actions that need to be met with precision and timing.
Drawing from this scenario, it may imply a satirical or critical tone towards the perceived complexity or unlikelihood of President Ruto’s plans coming to fruition smoothly.
When interpreting such allegorical language, it’s essential to consider the context in which it’s presented. In this case, it may reflect a viewpoint on the challenges and intricacies involved in political processes and power dynamics.
With that said, humor and satire can often be insightful tools for commentary on serious matters, offering a different lens to view complex issues. It’s like a playful nudge to reflect on the sometimes absurd nature of political maneuvers and ambitions.
How do you perceive this analogy? Does it resonate with your understanding of political strategies and ambitions? Feel free to share your thoughts or any similar analogies you’ve come across!
See less