Why does every new dictator in Kenya appoint his tribesmen to head key entities like the Tax Collection, Ports, Airports Authorities, Defense, Central Bank?
Related Posts
2 Her Answers
3 His Answers
What you’re describing in Kenya — and in many countries with similar political patterns — is part of what political scientists call ethnic patronage or neopatrimonialism. Here’s why it happens: --- 1. Survival Politics Over Merit Dictators and strongmen often prioritize loyalty over competence. KeyRead more
What you’re describing in Kenya — and in many countries with similar political patterns — is part of what political scientists call ethnic patronage or neopatrimonialism.
Here’s why it happens:
—
1. Survival Politics Over Merit
Dictators and strongmen often prioritize loyalty over competence.
Key institutions like the tax authority, ports, central bank, defence forces, and airports control money, trade, and security — the lifeblood of state power.
By appointing people from their own ethnic group or close political allies, they create a circle of trust that they believe is less likely to betray them.
—
2. Ethnic Politics as a Power Tool
Kenyan politics (like in many African states) has deep ethnic voting blocs.
Leaders often use appointments to reward their base and signal to their community that “we are in charge now.”
This strengthens their political legitimacy within their tribe but erodes national cohesion.
—
3. Control of Wealth and Resources
Positions in tax, ports, airports, and central banks give direct control over state revenue and trade.
Dictators want to keep this money flow within a trusted network — often relatives or tribesmen — to finance political projects, reward allies, and silence opposition.
—
4. Fear of Coup or Economic Sabotage
Defence chiefs from another ethnic group might not protect them in a crisis.
A central bank governor from a rival region could block funding for political patronage.
By filling these posts with their own, dictators reduce the risk of internal sabotage.
—
5. Colonial Legacy
During colonial times, administrators favored certain ethnic groups for key administrative and military roles.
Post-independence leaders inherited this centralized power structure and continued the pattern, now using ethnicity for personal rather than colonial gain.
—
📌 The Problem:
While it helps a leader cling to power, this practice undermines national unity, deepens tribalism, and often leads to corruption and inefficiency — because loyalty is valued more than skill.
Over time, this can create institutional decay where key sectors are run like personal fiefdoms, not public services.—
See less
2 Users- Reply
That's a bold and painful question — and an important one. The pattern you’re describing reflects deep-rooted structural issues in Kenyan politics, and sadly, it’s not unique to Kenya. But let’s break it down honestly: --- 🇰🇪 Why Do Many Leaders in Kenya Appoint Their Tribesmen to Key Positions? 1.Read more
That’s a bold and painful question — and an important one. The pattern you’re describing reflects deep-rooted structural issues in Kenyan politics, and sadly, it’s not unique to Kenya. But let’s break it down honestly:
—
🇰🇪 Why Do Many Leaders in Kenya Appoint Their Tribesmen to Key Positions?
1. 🔐 Ethnic Loyalty as a Survival Tactic
Many Kenyan leaders fear being undermined or overthrown — politically or economically.
By appointing loyal individuals from their tribe, they believe they are:
Securing personal power
Controlling information flow
Reducing chances of betrayal
This is not leadership — it’s political survivalism.
—
2. 🛡️ Control of Revenue and Power Centers
Positions like:
KRA (tax collection)
KPA (ports)
KAA (airports)
KDF/NSIS (defence/security)
CBK (Central Bank)
are not just jobs. They control:Money flows
Trade gateways
Security apparatus
Intelligence & surveillance
Controlling these allows a leader to cement power — or block rivals from rising.
—
3. 🧠 Colonial Legacy of Divide and Rule
Kenya’s political system was built on ethnic divisions, not national unity.
The British empowered some tribes over others and used regional inequality to maintain control.Post-independence leaders continued this model:
Using appointments to reward loyalty
Creating a perception that “it’s our turn to eat”
—
4. 🐍 Corruption Protection
If the people heading key institutions are loyal (often by blood or tribe), they are:
Less likely to investigate or expose graft
More likely to cover up irregularities
Useful in laundering public money discreetly
It creates a system of mutual protection, not accountability.
—
5. 🧨 Ethnic Politics = Electoral Strategy
In Kenya, elections are often won by building ethnic coalitions, not policy platforms.
So once in power, leaders feel pressure to “reward their base”:
Appointing fellow tribesmen to big jobs is seen as “taking care of our own.”
It helps maintain popularity at home, even if it worsens national unity.
—
⚠️ The Cost of This Practice
Erodes meritocracy — skilled, qualified people are sidelined.
Fuels ethnic tension — Kenyans start to see government as tribal loot.
Weakens institutions — agencies serve leaders, not citizens.
Feeds corruption — loyalty matters more than accountability.
Kills national identity — we remain tribes with flags, not one people.
—
🗣️ Final Thought:
Kenya doesn’t lack brains. It lacks leaders who put country before tribe.
Until we demand and reward leaders who unify — not divide — this cycle will continue every five years.> “Tribalism is not our culture. It’s a political weapon dressed as identity.”
Would you like a breakdown of how this issue has played out across Kenyan presidencies, or how other African countries have overcome tribal appointment systems?
See less- 4 Users
- Reply
This answer was edited.I think that we are now heading towards the right direction. Leaders are no longer appointing their tribesmen for bigger jobs but rather balancing among all the Kenyan tribes. We are not yet there fully, but we are heading towards the right direction.
I think that we are now heading towards the right direction. Leaders are no longer appointing their tribesmen for bigger jobs but rather balancing among all the Kenyan tribes. We are not yet there fully, but we are heading towards the right direction.
See less
Tribalism and nepotism continue to thrive in most sectors in Kenya. Leaders do everything possible to make their tribesmen benefit. It's a selfish way of thinking when one is in a position of leadership.
Tribalism and nepotism continue to thrive in most sectors in Kenya. Leaders do everything possible to make their tribesmen benefit. It’s a selfish way of thinking when one is in a position of leadership.
See lessI think its normal ,it just comes out naturally and its not about tribalism.
I think its normal ,it just comes out naturally and its not about tribalism.
See less